InspiredHeart
Thursday, 12 February 2026
Wednesday, 11 February 2026
February 10, 2026 › https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ Global Threats › Health Conditions › News Global Threats Epstein Pitched JPMorgan Chase on Plan to Get Bill Gates ‘More Money for Vaccines’ In the years leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, Bill Gates and key figures from the Gates Foundation regularly interacted with Jeffrey Epstein, discussing ways to finance and develop a global pandemic preparedness and vaccination network, according to the latest “Epstein Files.” by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. February 10, 2026 ...................... (The devil has many generals. Impossible to believe the breadth and depth, of bone chilling miasma that not only shrouds them and their work, but that holds these generals together... like chain mail links, Their work is eugenics , and they are busy holding down a smothering cloak of death over the living. Michaela.)
XXXXXXXXXXXX Excerpt from https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/: "Gates could ‘work with anyone on earth’ but ‘chose a registered sex offender’
According to Ji, Nikolic’s involvement is significant. In August 2013, Gates and Epstein signed an agreement, in which Gates “specifically requested” that Epstein “personally serve” as Nikolic’s representative. The letter noted Epstein’s “existing collegial relationship” with Gates.
“This agreement was executed five years after Epstein’s conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution,” Ji wrote. “Gates had the resources to work with anyone on earth. He chose a registered sex offender — and put it in writing.” "
XXXXXXXXXXXXX In the years leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, Bill Gates and key figures from the Gates Foundation regularly interacted with Jeffrey Epstein, discussing ways to finance and develop a global pandemic preparedness and vaccination network.
The communications between Gates and Epstein were included in the “Epstein Files” released Jan. 30 by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Last year’s passage of the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act prompted the release.
Sayer Ji told The Defender the files show that Epstein “functioned as a switchboard” connecting “hedge funds, central banks, billionaires, academic institutions and global health initiatives.”
Ji published his analysis of health- and medical-related information in the files in a series of Substack articles and posts on X.
Seamus Bruner, director of research at the Government Accountability Institute, said the files revealed the workings of a network of “Controligarchs on steroids, but with shocking new receipts.”
Bruner said the files showed that Epstein helped develop “the architecture for pandemic profiteering” years before the COVID-19 pandemic.
The documents largely date from the 2010s — after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting underage sex and his inclusion on a registry of sex offenders.
Ji noted that months before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the same actors who appear in the Epstein files participated in Event 201 — a simulation of a global pandemic caused by a coronavirus.
The pandemic preparedness infrastructure built in the years before the pandemic helped lead to this simulation, Ji wrote.
According to The Hill, members of the U.S. Congress began reviewing unredacted versions of the documents on Monday.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who co-sponsored the Epstein Files Transparency Act along with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), told The Defender the documents’ release is about justice, not politics.
“Rep. Ro Khanna and I have tried to keep the Epstein files from being political. The Democrats want to make it about Trump, and the Republicans want to make it about the Clintons. We want to make it about the survivors and getting them justice and transparency,” Massie said.
Gates, Epstein and the ‘architecture behind pandemics as a business model’
Ji’s series of Substack posts revealed what he described as “a 20-year architecture behind pandemics as a business model — with Bill Gates at the center of the network,” along with multinational financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase.
The documents, dating from 2011 to 2019, illustrate an “architecture whose foundations predate the COVID-19 era by more than a decade,” Ji wrote. He said they constitute evidence of “a major Wall Street bank asking a convicted sex offender to define the architecture of a Gates-linked charitable fund.”
The documents included several emails outlining the development of a Gates-led charitable fund. A Feb. 17, 2011, email from JPMorgan Chase’s Juliet Pullis to Epstein included questions from the “team that is putting together some ideas for Gates.”
Epstein’s reply outlined how this fund could be structured. The proposal would be developed further in the following months.
In a July 26, 2011, email from Epstein to JPMorgan Chase executive Jes Staley, on which Boris Nikolic, Gates’ chief science and technology adviser, was copied, described a “silo based proposal that will get bill [Gates] more money for vaccines.”
By Aug. 17, 2011, Staley and Mary Erdoes, then-CEO of JPMorgan Asset and Wealth Management, were discussing more details of the proposed fund, including developing “an offshore arm — especailly for vaccines” and projecting “billions of dollars” in donations within two years.
In a response later that day, Epstein said Gates was “terribly frustrated” at the slow pace of establishing the fund. He said Gates was insistent that “additional money for vaccines” be included in an upcoming presentation about the fund. XXXXX
See Full article. Here :
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/epstein-pitched-jpmorgan-chase-plan-bill-gates-more-money-vaccines/?utm_source=cc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20260210
Monday, 9 February 2026
Its all about leaving the density of low vibration creation, where we continue to NOT KNOW what is 'better for us' and 'life enhancing' because we have been compliant with programming that delivers the opposite, to the point where the 'waters' have become so muddied, and where the waters are the 'consciousness' waves that we not only reside in but are that which we are.....So to me its always been about seeing the mud, calling it out, and trying to find a WAY through that, to perhaps a clearer cleaner pristine habitat, but definitely its about finding and anchoring deep inside 'LIVING WELL and DYING WELL'. A GOOD LIFE and GOOD DEATH. Stopping the life cycle's (and reincarnation cycles) of treading through mud tracks. Inner child healing is about revealing that the inner child held the spark through the forest, that even though the spark remains constant, it has become obscured , perhaps via protection from wounding, wearing shields.... grown like our limbs... and 'learning' HOW and WHAT we are in that forest as we walk through the battle field of aggression and corruption. Where we can ONLY SEE THIS WAY AS THE TRUTH OF THE WORLD....this becomes our truth.... and so our personality morphs into something (other than the truth of what we are) adjusting to THAT habitat. The personality adopts an EGO armour that is animated and animates HOW AND IN WHAT ways we show up...This is the face we show, and is the interface with which we exchange relationships (with self and with others and with life) inside the 'REALITY' That HAS SHOWN UP FOR US. And it dictates then how we respond to what is perceived as what is going on around. This then becomes the basis for what WE create in the cycle. The fight, flight, freeze or fawn response will only keep us in the EGO response and keep us in the type of mud tracks that we inherited. We can step out and revisit the inner child's world that while hidden from us, its knowledge of GOLDEN Grid remains at the core. Attention to Finding this, or having the intention to REFOCUS away from the devilled eyes that want you to look through them, will foster and reclaim the early spark 'belief' that all is ACTUALLY well. WE Just have to move ourselves from BEHIND the murkey masks that we operate from, knowingly or unknowingly....The activation to do this is open to all, but it calls for complete disobedience from the compliance of dancing with the devil. Remove yourself from this dance, and CALL IT OUT< This is not acceptable> Raise your head to see above this mess, and focus a life into your view, that IS cognisant of the world that you do want to live in, and how you wish to live. When you REintroduce yourself to THAT world, and finally by seeing the Finalty of this gaping wound that we have been living in, we see that there has always been a spark in us for 'wonder' and 'awe'. We see that we forgot who and what we are, and the remembering has been a long time coming. A mission statement in the core of humanity, lie in echoes calling to remember. It is not fairy land, but seems like it. When children start off through the forest of the density of this world, they encounter many situations that make or break them, hurt or hound them, and the heart is filled with courage or filled with despair, depending on the familial and cultural inherited threads of response to (OR, EVEN REQUIRED FROM) the world into which they emerged. The responses are just mirrored reflections of past creations, returning with each generations that was taught to believe there was absolute AUTHORITY and DOMINION over them. So refocus and allow the emergence of the spark, once dormant, but now calling you out of the forest grown by your ancestorial generations, in response to their unchanging and unchallenged beliefs in the status quo. Transmission ends. Michaela .
Sunday, 8 February 2026
(Edit today: I'm Calling It OUT, as an Advocate of living well. How the density of low vibration living, by SQUASHING humans, and heaping them into concrete layering, sustains and maintains low vibration jurisdiction. Meaning of Jurisdiction : is the territory or sphere of activity over which the legal authority of a court or other institution extends )......I live in Edgware, which is in North London, or greater London. It is on the outskirts of, and easy access into the build up of the city. Diverse already, and often you can feel like your in another country. Often no English accents or voices can be heard; It is home to many many people of different origin. Maybe because of this, town planning has implemented plans to insert the equivalent of another town... into it, at the heart of the town, in the form of reconstruction the main hub of travel between the surrounding towns, and the build UP of homes in the form of at least 20 x 22 + story high buildings. The government has decided that housing needs are calling for this, the population of London has expanded exponentially AND as there are NO HOMES for all the invited and uninvited into the country, they will be making powerful moves for themselves to meet the consequential permanent housing needs by building towns upon towns, They have already agreed building on what is known as the green belt around London, and slowly slowly the green area around London has been encroached upon...but it must be said that the nicer areas of green belt land have been built on by the nicer developments, and the more luxury end of properties to be lived in by those who can afford the beautiful views of green space, fields and stretch of skies available to the wealthy. Edgware is located in what was considered buy many as a 'nice' area, more green and suburban, and less inner city, but still on its doorstep and distanced by a short walk, are areas that have been rapidly urbanised and carry the consequences of being Changed irreversibly, into rough market streets that bear no resemblance to the working class London borough it was 30 years ago. The escalation and encroaching on space and resident demographs, transforming them into the cities dumping ground, is this version of the mirroring reflection of how London has changed and I cant help thinking that All those who are making the plans, choices and policies, the mayor, and politics, the developers.....know they will be dead and gone at some point, and couldn't CARE LESS about the role, the importance of forward planning, LIVING WELL, and the relevance of what they are managing into the future....And care only ONLY about their Status, their Money, back handers, profits and social standing, and how their LEGACIES are for themselves and their families. Look at Blair...not even in government, but he knows that Government is where the power is and positions himself to remain a driving factor for policies FROM WHICH HE PERSONALLY GAINS. He was BIG in the move to digital ID and a main factor in exceeding numbers entering the country. The increased masses then need to be controlled and housed amongst other things that he was personally involved in creating the problem that he was so positioned to profit from. Michaela.
WHO?.......... from Meryl Nass substack Feb 7 : While WHO tries to move ahead with its Pathogen Sharing for Benefits proposal (the pandemic agent lending library), the Slovakian government has said NO to the plan And created a solid directive to be addressed to the PABS working group, which meets again this week. Meryl Nass Feb 7.........(side note and my observation: Its funny but Trump only pulled out from WHO, AFTER Epstein's demise in prison. Any thoughts on that? Michaela)
who'd a thought it? Who was buried deepin pandemic profiteering and therefore in instigation of pandemic...........From Mery Nass substack 7 feb 2026. XXXX "Now we know that Jeffrey Epstein wanted to use pandemic planning as yet another financial product he could sell as a public-private partnership “for the good.” We know that many $billions have been spent on pandemic planning and response (and continue to be spent) and that the field is ripe for abuse and the minting of new millionaires and billionaires, as COVID was.
We know that the WHO’s original, mouth-watering proposals for pandemic planning, which it would oversee, would have raised its budget from $2-3 billion/year to about $40 billion/year, had things gone according to plan. The initial build-out of the pandemic surveillance, data-monitoring and lab empire had been estimated to cost $100-200B by McKinsey, about 5 years ago.
The amounts involved are too huge for the players involved to let go, despite the clear planetary risks. Pandemic planning dollars could potentially save the WHO from the oblivion it is now heading towards, as we come to realize the organization actually did very little to help the poor and downtrodden. One way of looking at the WHO is as a money-laundering operation, blue-washing funds from governments and industry to do their bidding, while paying for a massive infrastructure and cushy jobs.
While the US left the WHO, and several other countries have refused to go along with the WHO’s pandemic plans, there are still many nations engaged with the Pandemic Treaty, whose success hinges entirely on a Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) system being developed and accepted.
After the last committees failed to bring a PABS agreement to completion, WHO did what it usually does and fired those committees and created a new working group to try and pull PABS off.
Now, the government of Slovakia, whose Prime Minister, Robert Fico, was nearly killed by several gunshots to the abdomen after publicly denouncing the WHO’s pandemic plan in 2024, has produced a formal criticism of the WHO’s plan. The document lists a number of items that should be objectionable to all who believe in international law, in preventing GOF research and in events like COVID never happening again.
Other countries should take note, and may want to make similar demands of the negotiators.
The Slovakian Directive provides a template by which governments and their citizens can judge what the WHO working group creates. It can be read on the Slovakian Justice Ministry website:
https://www.justice.gov.sk/tlacovespravy/vlada-sr-schvalila-smernicu-k-rokovaniam-o-pristupe-a-zdielani-patogenov-na-zaklade-pripomienok-ministerstva-spravodlivosti-sr/
or in English using Google translate below.
The Government of the Slovak Republic has approved the directive on negotiations on access and sharing pathogens on the basis of comments from the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic "
Saturday, 7 February 2026
Object now to the Ballymore Edgware scheme (GLA Stage 1 – Stage 2 imminent) Edgware Town Centre (3,800 homes, 10,000 new residents, towers up to 29 storeys) In spite of massive public opposition, with over 7,000 objections submitted, Barnet Council’s Labour councillors approved Ballymore Edgware’s outline application for 25 tower blocks. That decision is not final. Because the scheme is exceptionally large and high-risk, it must now be decided by the Mayor of London, while fundamental issues — including the unproven safety of the underground bus garage — remain unresolved. The application is currently at GLA Stage 1 because Barnet has not yet finalised the Section 106. Stage 2 is expected imminently and is likely to allow only about two weeks for representations. Please object now to ensure your concerns are on the Mayor’s record — and be ready to re-submit or update your objection when Stage 2 opens.
My response: High rise buildings all over London only shows the reduction of quality of life, where people are squeezed into, and on top of each other, in layers upon layers of concrete. I don't object to flats, as many people are happy in flats, according to different times in their life, and situations and circumstances, but most will not want to stay in flats with growing children or in older age. BUT When there is no choice but HIGH RISEs as nothing else is free, or available for them to move into, it is a desperate situation for older populations. And the populations are aging. You can say that most countries have high rise residency and the elderly are living in high sky rise buildings, because that is all that is available to poorer people, but we are not that...And where it does exist in this country, this is not, and never was a contributor to 'living well'. Why be a creator and developer like this when you can be ethical and forward thinking in terms of living well. Which is something that will have more weight in the future. So Why be backwards instead of innovative and forward thinking, ethically and morally.
When high rise is what is being been invested in, due to its ease and financial gain for the developers, it will have taken over the entire area. Blocking sky lines and blocking light, will be depressing. To be boxed in like this when coming into Edgware will be bad enough, but to be expected to live this, having changed the nature of the area, and changed the already busy 'hustle and bustle' of the area, (already quite diverse with strong cultural groups long ago settled in the area,) into something else entirely will have social consequences that are already well known, and well known by the academics and politicians, but are factored into the money equation and written off as someone's else's problem. for example the parents dealing with kids, or the hospitals, or the victims of behaviour crimes, the police and any other individual or group that cleans up after social consequences go bad. Also the amount of rubbish accumulating in both the business streets and in areas where people do not know to manage their rubbish and waste and dump it anywhere with fly tipping already a weekend activity, and worse near the low level high rise flats in Edgware Highstreet, where the build up intensifies in the lead up to waste collection days, overflowing all over the streets. Check near Iceland on various days for verification. There is also the danger of Possible Behaviour problems, consequences of increased people of different cultures, in high density with little knowledge of council laws and no indigenous understanding of local or natural laws of how we should live together. We expect a certain tolerance around us, but that is often misunderstood, and then we have the instance of increased asbo's, with increased populations, growth in drug use, and addictions, or merely misunderstandings, rife in normal situations, will be multiplied intolerance of each other. Socially the structure will need more support to oversee and police the area, where policing is not even a presence that we see now. Policing high rise blocks will be more difficult than policing the streets. The difficulty of what we see as undesirable activities, already a problem, will become more difficult as they become normalised or blended into crowded backdrops. The many different communities already here, will see more of the social problems that are usually associated with in inner city and urban streets. People will naturally respond to or react to the loss of small instances of quality of life, like personal space. The normal person will, maybe in response, feel it necessary to go elsewhere to shop, to bank, and go for coffee.
The possibility of loneliness and isolation presents itself in such massive developments of incoming huge populations and will lead to more feeling lonely and pushed out of 'feeling at HOME' here, therefore More reliance on GP and healthcare will add weight and burden there. Feeling safe is the 'quality of life' box, that will not be ticked. The development is Not conducive for happy living, its just ticking boxes to cover the 'government's' 'housing needs' just to fill the area with 'higher and higher numbers of populations' that can neither be properly cared for, nor properly provided for with good amenities in order to live well, such as enough good schools and nurseries, good amenities, there will be over crowded tfl transport. Doctors surgeries, already overcrowded and oversubscribed with long waiting times to see doctors and get referrals will add to the frustrations. The only ones who will 'live well' out of this development is the developers and the local councils who actually agree to this and will be getting £100s of 1000s more in council tax payments from increased property. More money to council tax...BUT More stress on the area, SO more costs in cleaning and day to day maintenance of the site which will ultimately come back on the people...the residents of Edgware the newly housed, AND those already here. So there is Not only structural stresses, but stresses on everything already here that is now expected to take on more weight and burden, such as the roads, the thoroughfares, queues in banks, stresses in diverse groups that culturally do not share well, and have different community priorities. Depressing areas with only high rise buildings filling the visual field, brings a backdrop to the high cost of loss in personal space and quality of life, when living in hugely high-density populated areas. The burden on the psychology will be huge, your populations and future citizens will be living in conditions that will foster behaviour of the type "don't care, wont care" BUT sadly that will be because of a bigger loss of community feeling, than is here today, there will be less of being a member of a unified community in sky high living. Lots of separate groups already exist, that only have community with themselves but not with others and other groups. Older people have been most vulnerable to this loss of citizen safety, and belonging. The only thing they have is their doctors appointments, but that will become less and less available to them, and t in all places designed now to fast track and high speed people as herds through life not being able to see anything other than sky high buildings around them. People are made to feel they are burden if they are seen to be taking up more space and time then is available to individuals living in highly populated areas. Of course this is not of any consideration for the developers and the money makers, who will not under any circumstance be living here. The impact will be huge, and if this is the only investment OFFER to be made in Edgware than that is sad. I see it affect the psychology of kids today, and impacting any meaningful relationships to the area where they live. Residents will perhaps, be unbothered about being squashed into these blocks, as it is thought to be better than their previous circumstances, or bring welcome chance of a home. Maybe residents will be unbothered or unaware of the area and of the wider community. BUT many WILL want to have a good life and live well, but sky high living won't give that ....in the sense of being squashed into an area .....that has no provisions for being.... not doubled in size.... not quadrupled in size, but increased in size by the power of 10's. What ever the population of the area is NOW, will be multiplied By powers of 10. (1000s). So Edgware, being a small town on the edge of London is not the place. You don't have to be psychic to see the future of Edgware if this continues wholescale, as planned. Already people are miserable with all the traffic jams and road works in Edgware for at least the last 5 years, AND obviously restructuring has been going on already, adding to the major works intending to take years to complete...So living with scaffolding up for years and years (and it will take YEARS) as the back drop to living in or in proximity to, or working inside, a sprawling noisy building site will be unbearable. I am happy to come in and be a part of the talks as I think you need to be able to answer to these points. You need to see Edgware properly as an interesting place, it is historic in its place, and is situated as entrance into London from its northern point. It is home to many home owners, business owners and home to established working class English families alike...it is home to many foreign families from middle eastern cultures and central European cultures, there is plenty of diversity mixed with increased injection of small business enterprises and interests, that perhaps are more dodgy than anything else. Edgware is a location that has already, over the last 10 years at least, given up space to intense influxes from Europe and other countries. And now Edgware is just trying to balance itself. It is a location for investment, but the right investment, not just a site, ripe to be taken over for a 'one -design -meets-all-development-site' just because that is a continuation of what's happening in nearby towns, and along the train lines, such as in Hendon and Colindale. Happy to help to with any discussions. or consults.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)






