Dr David Martin Part 2: The sinister rise of the surveillance state By Kathy Gyngell - September 8, 2021 "Well, the fact of the matter is, and I’ve made this statement very, very frequently, you cannot manufacture a bioweapon and not say that you’re trying to kill people. That’s what a bioweapon is for. And the weaponisation of the coronavirus, which officially started in 1999 when Anthony Fauci came up with this brilliant idea that he could come up with an ‘infectious, replication defective’ – and those are the actual words used – form of coronavirus. And he paid researchers at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. He paid researchers there to invent a pathogen that did not exist. That’s the reason why I’m very careful with the language that I used. You’ll notice I’m not saying a virus and I’m not saying a vaccine for good reason. We are not talking about a virus, we are talking about an engineered pathogen. We are not talking about a vaccine. We are talking about the introduction of a computer-simulated code in the form of mRNA, but it’s a computer-simulated code not to stimulate your immune system, but to turn your body into a factory producing S1 spike proteins similar to those found in coronavirus. Slow that tape down and listen to it again. Exactly what I said. You’re not injecting a piece of a virus. You’re not injecting a viral fragment. You are injecting a code to make your body produce a pathogen. And then you’re hoping – and that’s all you’re doing – you’re hoping that the pathogen your body produces also elicits an immune response. But this is structurally so important for people to understand: the code that is injected into your body between January 12 and January 20 of 2020, that code was uploaded from a simulated server that was a simulation of the spike protein mRNA. And it was given to the Vaccine Research Council and Kizzy Corbett said, the doctor who made this stuff at the various CDC, and I’m quoting from her interview with Francis Collins: ‘It’s really cool because you don’t even need much of a lab. You build one of these on your computer at home.’ That’s an admission of biological warfare. Adams: This is extraordinary what you’re laying out, and yet it’s also extraordinary, the cognitive dissonance that so many mainstream doctors have where you explain that to them, as you just did, and they will say, ‘No, that couldn’t be,’ or all kinds of justifications or excuses for not believing that. But you ask them, ‘What is the antigen target that’s described by the mRNA instructions?’ And they’ll have to (inaudible), ‘Oh, it’s the spike protein, you know, subunit.’ And then you ask them, ‘What are the vascular effects of the spike protein subunit?’ And if they’ve done any research, ‘Well, it causes widespread vascular damage.’ So how can you not realise that these are instructions to tell the body to build pathogenic particles that will cause harm? How can they . . . how can they not see that? "

from https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/dr-david-martin-part-2-the-sinister-rise-of-the-surveillance-state/ Dr David Martin Part 2: The sinister rise of the surveillance state By Kathy Gyngell - September 8, 2021