Neptune retrograde is many things: unity with the divine, flight into unreality, immersion in love, avoidance through self-deception and compassionate repose. It is both our return to sacred source and all we do to avoid the stark terrain we must sometimes cross to get there. Neptune offers a choice: to embrace the divine or avoid ourselves. We simply cannot do both.
The healing offered by Neptune requires faith so deep we are willing to relinquish our very identity if we must. To experience the deep peace of Neptune’s unconditional love we cannot maintain a narrative about who did what and when, how our life should be as opposed to how it is, or re-run past hurts, old triumphs or future imaginings. Neptune knows nothing but everything all as one. When it turns retrograde it provides as a backdrop to the ups and downs of everyday life, the opportunity to let everything go and immerse ourselves in the divine flow of love forever emerging from the heart of Sacred Source. In this flow we are nothing and no-one and yet everything too, complete and forever whole.
The ‘nothing and no-one’ of Neptune is not a victim or underdog, subject to the whims of others or the complex fabric of life itself. This no-one is everything, the great void within and without, the endless dark space between the planets we know so well. Neptune teaches that only in being prepared to end can we ever truly begin; that in the willing demise of all we believed ourselves to be is found the deepest and most vibrant peace – the peace of being nothing and everything, a mystical knowing of presence and absence in one breath and a single moment of endless time. We cannot think ourselves into this state of being, nor can we speak of it effectively. In Neptune’s realm words are no more, concepts fail, thought is redundant, you and I disappear. It knows nothing but the infinite universe in its entirety and sees us all as the limitless space we truly are.
As Neptune retrogrades through its own sign of Pisces it offers us the chance to disappear when necessary, to withdraw into the realm of inner space as dark and endless as the heavens above. But as much as we yearn for Neptune’s peace we may encounter deep resistance. To know it we must relinquish all we wish to be alongside all we yearn to leave behind, for Neptune knows no discrimination between pleasurable or painful attachments. It sees only attachment, the isolation it creates and the solution of release. We cannot pick and choose what to transcend, we must simply let it all go.
Neptune rarely makes a big noise. It sits silently waiting, gradually erasing a little bit of us here, a corner there, a sharp edge or heavy load. When retrograde its release takes us deeper and we may lack the usual signposts of self and identity, role and responsibility, which tell us who we are. But there’s no cause for panic and nothing to fear. We are safe, even as we disappear. In the face of life’s tragedies and triumphs, Neptune bids us let it all go whenever we choose. In doing so we know ourselves not as someone releasing identity but as the very act of release itself: the freedom of a bird in flight, of ice melting into open sea, sand shifting in the breeze. Of sacred space and cosmic grace, we are born forever free.
Sarah Varcas
|
Thursday, 16 June 2016
beautifully described: ABOUT 'LETTING GO': 13th June – 20th November 2016: Neptune Retrograde in Pisces: Born of Sacred Space by Sarah Varcas on 13/06/2016
Gentle but timely advice. "Some may find that the week leading to the Solstice and the weeks after are very intense and full of opportunities for you to release all ties to the lower matrix."
So maybe this explains my dream of being in a tsunami but surviving the tidal energy flow.
Did I 'die out of the matrix' and resume life in some other 'flow'?
This is a great message about releasing attachments to lower vibrations in the 3rd dimensional matrix.
Whether or not we can actually 'feel', 'see' or 'know' anything in the currently accumulating crescendo of tsunami-like energy. Lets let it happen in our lives.
There is a branch that hangs over the matrix pool of now stagnant and decaying, decomposing to dissolve, so over, old energy. The branch is one of upgrade, that we consciously can hold onto and deliver us through, as the tsunami energy rushes in to CLEAN US UP and to reclaim US, and to UPGRADE the space we inhabit. This is about US coming back to knowing we are individual aspects of Divine source, All-that-is.
Look within to find the branch of enlightenment and so release the grip of fear of loosing all this mindless 3D stuff.
Some may find that the week leading to the Solstice and the weeks after are very intense and full of opportunities for you to release all ties to the lower matrix.
Third Wave Moving Beyond the 3rd Dimension ~ Galactic Council of Light
|
Wednesday, 15 June 2016
From Stankov, June 15 2016.
Immigration Economics: Illegal Aliens Are Our Bread and Butter
David Haggith, June 13, 2016
Foreword
Georgi Stankov, June 15, 2016
David has written an excellent survey on illegal immigration as a major economic factor in the Orion economy. This topic is central in the current presidential race thanks to Donald Trump and it is a survival issue in Europe that has been flooded by illegal immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa. Both regions were devastated by the hegemonic policy of the Empire of Evil and its NATO stooges, so that the Europeans have to deal with a self-created problem.
The situation in the USA, and to a lesser extent in Canada, is similar. Illegal immigration comes predominantly from South and Central America through the Mexican border and is secretly supported by the ruling cabal as thelatest Orlando shooting revealed and David shows in a comprehensive manner in his article below.
It is his greatest achievement to point at the elephant in the room nobody speaks about and which even I have admittedly neglected largely in my previous discussions. Illegal aliens are a central piece of the long-term policy of the dark ruling cabal in the west to enslave humanity. They are the prototype of the serfs in the past that were actually “bond slaves (serfs)“. This term comes originally from the German language “Leibeigene“. Germany was the classical land of Leibeigenschaft (serfdom), together with Russia where “крепостной” (bond slaves) and “крепостное право” (serfdom rule) existed until the late 19th century. It is a central topic in the great novels of all famous Russian writers, such as Tolstoy, Gogol, Pushkin, Dostoyevsky, to name a few of them. The abolition of serfdom in Russia finally in 1868, after a series of previous reforms, was considered the greatest social achievement at that time and led to the modernisation of this country.
Likewise, the abolition of “Leibegenschaft” in Germany in the early 19th century led to the rapid unification and industrialisation of this late former world power and its emergence on the political stage as a powerful rival of the ruling British Empire and the declining Grande Nation, which they easily defeated in 1871. Before that the German aristocracy had full power over their “Leibegene” and sold millions of them to America, more or less as slaves, as to improve their broke budgets. This explains why it was a narrow decision whether German or English would become the official language in the USA. There was a time when the number of German emigrants was bigger than the English-speaking ones, whereas the vast portion of the latter came from the impoverished Ireland, which was another slave state ante porta of the British Empire.
Both the British Empire and its offshoot in the new Continent, the former British colonies in North America, were the greatest slave traders and slave owners of all time and committed more crimes to humanity than any other nation. It is notable that the slavery in America was abolished around the same time as in Russia with the Thirteenth Amendment in December 1865, after a most bloody and savage civil war was fought out that destroyed the South states for decades to come.
Based on this long-standing tradition of slavery and serfdom in Western civilisation, it is not surprising that the ruling cabal now support in a clandestine manner the creation of a new class of serfs out of illegal immigrants in the current postmodern society. They do that against all established national laws that they have adopted in their national parliaments in a deliberate act of destabilising the foundations of western civilisation as seen in Europe nowadays. This is all part and parcel of the focused preparation of the dark ones in power to install the NWO in the current End Time, where all the people will be treated in the same way as bond serfs without any legal rights. This is so obvious now and Trump has raised this issue, however without revealing the true intentions of the establishment in the USA and Europe as his latest disappointing speech reveals.
Watch video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnUE1LtxalI
David has discussed this crucial new sociological and economic phenomenon in-depth and I am surprised that until now I have not read any article that points so clearly at the 500 pound gorilla in the room which nobody wants to see. Not even Trump. That is why I decided to publish David’s article even though he remains within the framework of conventional discussion and does not go further enough to explore the hidden motives of the ruling cabal to promote illegal and uncontrolled immigration and to systematically fail to resolve this issue with legal means, which should be a very easy matter to deal with as some other countries like Russia show. As David has very well explained, the 0.01% of the richest cabal that possess 90% of the world’s wealth need bond serfs to do the cheap work for them and undermine with their presence the social rights of the organised in trade unions workers and employees in the western countries in order to abolish them finally when the NWO will be established.
As we all know, this will not happen because this uppermost mother planet is ascending into the light. But we must know exactly why certain social, legal and economic phenomena about which we constantly read in the mass media have been created by the ruling cabal in the first place and what heinous plans they are trying to accomplish with that. I hope that Donald Trump reads David’s article, or our website, and raises this issue to a higher and more critical level of discussion. Only in this way can he successfully challenge the current accusations of the treacherous elite who blame him of stoking racism.
Whereas these same criminals want to exploit all alien immigrants without social rights as bond serfs in order to enrich themselves, undermine the social rights of the working class and install the NWO of total enslavement.
This is a most scandalous topic and one cannot resolve it properly unless one knows exactly what is the motivation of the ruling cabal that allows this illegal immigration without exerting any control on the national borders and on an international scale, where simple measures would have prevented all the perils of uncontrolled migration if the ruling elite only show good will. And let us not forget that the Empire of evil deliberately destroys all other nations that even remotely oppose its imperialist, hegemonic foreign policy and creates havoc in order to unleash precisely this kind of mass migration as we now observe in Europe from the Middle East and North Africa. In this way the European vassals are also destabilized and subjugated to the interests of the Empire of Evil.
Enjoy now the lengthy and excellent article on illegal immigrants by David Haggith as the new class of bond serfs and slaves for the benefit of the rich and ruling cabal.
___________________________________________
Have you ever wondered why politicians make some immigration illegal and then turn a blind eye to illegal immigration wherever it is happening … for decades? What about why they talk so much about building walls to keep out the vast hoards, rather than simply arresting the much smaller number of people who hire illegal immigrants? Surely drying up the jobs that are available to illegal immigrants would be much more economical than building a thousand-mile wall. This article will tell you why we make some immigration illegal and then turn a blind eye to it.
Have you also wondered why politician make it illegal for millions of people to enter the country and then eventually support naturalizing those people who broke the laws these very politicians made? This article will answer that, too.
First, I’ll state that immigration is largely about economics; and by that I do not simply mean that people are coming to the U.S. to gain economic opportunity, though, of course, they are. Nor do I simply mean immigrants are taking jobs away from Americans, though, of course, they are. Nor am I going to talk about the welfare costs that come with migrant workers because those get discussed a lot.
I want to talk about a major economic factor in the immigration issue that is the elephant in the room that no one is talking about, and it’s not just a GOP elephant. Immigration economics has a dark underbelly that neither party will ever bring up. Since immigration reform is one of the major planks of the Republican’s top candidate for the presidency, there is no time like the present to talk about the elephant.
Neither party wants to end illegal immigration nor make all immigration legal
The fact is both parties have created an immigration dance that they love. First, they make immigration illegal, then they both turn a blind eye toward illegal immigration. That, in turn, causes the number of illegal aliens to grow quickly as word travels that “they won’t really do anything about it.” Eventually, a large subculture of illegal immigrants becomes a serious social problem that demands political resolution because citizens of the country start getting worked up over the social conflicts they are feeling and the jobs they see going to illegal immigrants.
The next step of the dance is the tricky one. We saw it happen in Reagan’s day. Both parties compromise in order to fix the problem without fixing it. They fix it by creating amnesty, which they always say is not amnesty because the citizens don’t like amnesty. They don’t fix it in in that they promise all the citizens who are angry about illegal immigration they will only let these illegal aliens in the door because turning them away would create a humanitarian crisis since the number has grown so large.Then they will batten the gates much tighter and never let it happen again. Only … they never do batten the gates, and so it happens all over again. Never mind that the number of illegal immigrants only grew to the point of becoming a humanitarian crisis because those same politicians turned a blind eye to illegal immigration for years.
This article will also answer why that illegal immigration cycle continues on a rinse-and-repeat basis. By the end of the article you may think, “Wow, he is really jaded about politicians,” or you might thing, “Wow, that makes total sense from an economic standpoint, and it really, really stinks.” You’d be right either way.
Illegal aliens are our bread and butter, and we eat them for lunch. More particularly, politicians know what side their bread is buttered on. They get paid to provide cheap labor for rich people.
Let’s break immigration economics down to some obvious facts that are completely avoided in the conversation about immigration reform.
The economics of Illegal immigration
The answer to all these questions is really pretty simple: Illegal immigrants provide the closest thing the U.S. has to a peasant class. It is important that politicians make them illegal so that they will be true peasants (people with no native rights nor any say in the laws that govern them). It’s important that politicians turn a blind eye to them so that we will have peasants here … where we want them. It doesn’t accomplish anything toward creating a class of serfs to do work for the rich if we keep them out of the country. At the same time, if they have rights as citizens (or as legal immigrants), they will not remain serfs. We’ll have a peasant revolt.
The wealthy business owners have wanted a peasant class ever since they could no longer have a slave class. A peasant class is the next best thing. Often, they have lusted for such laborers overseas, and they have gotten politicians into office who made it possible for them to exploit an offshore peasant class with sweat shops.
However, there are many jobs that cannot go overseas. If you’re going to run hotels or restaurants for people traveling in the US or if you’re going to farm land here in the US, that work has to be done here by more expensive American workers. If only we had a resident peasant class to do the work that American workers don’t want to do because it doesn’t pay enough. Hmm. Let’s create one.
The Bush dynasty opened the doors to outsourcing as many jobs to lower-wage workers outside the country as possible in order to help wealthy stock holders amass more wealth, but there wasn’t anything either Bush could do about those jobs that have to be done inside the country … such as cleaning hotels and bussing dishes at restaurants or picking tomatoes grown domestically…. or was there?
For those jobs, they needed to insource the outsourcing. In other words, they needed to find ways to get peasant labor into the country. You know, the kind of labor that doesn’t expect health insurance and doesn’t cry about working conditions and most of all, works cheap.
Strong immigration laws make that possible so long as you plan to create them then mostly ignore them. When someone is illegal they are willing to work without benefits and with fewer rights and for less money because they have to stay under the radar. They are afraid of standing up for their rights. Heck, they hardly have rights to stand up for; but if they did stand up, they’d be deported instantly. (Those are the ones who particularly get to be sent home and made a show of so the p0liticians can convince the citizens that they are trying to uphold the laws.) Of course, you have to continually arrest some and send them back home in order to keep the fear real.
Making some people’s presence in the country illegal while turning a blind eye to their being here assures a peasant class of workers. It’s as simple as that: Illegal immigrants are willing to work at subsistence levels because that is what they come from. They don’t need a wage that makes an American living. They have no say in what the government does to them or with them because, as peasants, they have no vote; but also because they have to keep their heads low. The fact that they have almost no status in society at all assures they will remain cheap.
As always, if you want to know why things happen, follow the money.
If you think I’m being cynical and that the government is not intentionally letting illegal aliens in to take jobs at low wages, then ask yourself this simple question: What would happen if, instead of trying to arrest and return homemillions of illegal aliens (which the government maintains is nearly impossible), the government just started arresting and jailing the thousands of people who have hired them … starting with just the top one-hundred? The jobs would dry up before you even made it through the top one hundred.
That’s what would happen, and you know it. People will hire illegal aliens if there is only a financial penalty if you get caught and if they’re pretty sure the government will keep turning a blind eye to the situation; but start putting those employers in jail, and all employers will quickly be checking the ID and green cards of their migrant workers to make sure they have a legal right to work here.
As soon as the jobs dried up, illegal immigrants who could get no work would find their plight worse here than in their home country, and they would return home of their own free will … unless, of course, you put them on welfare because you’re softhearted, but also softheaded about the costs … and you feel it is the United State’s obligation to save the entire world from poverty and to make your kids and grandkids pay for your benevolence by financing the welfare with national debt.
You see, you really don’t have to round up millions of people hiding in bushes. You have to round up only hundreds of big employers whose whereabouts are easily known by their big houses. Notice that does not happen. Not ever. You really don’t have to build a wall either. Notice the wall has been talked about for, at least, thirty years and still isn’t finished.
Big business wants cheap labor, and politicians protect their benefactors. The cheapest labor is that which is illegal but knowingly allowed to happen anyway. The justification for turning a blind eye is always, “Americans don’t want these jobs.” If your head is dumber than a turnip and stuck equally deep in the dirt, then you have long accepted that as truth. Actually, it’s just that it sounded reasonable, so you didn’t think it through. If you were dumber than a turnip you wouldn’t be reading this economics blog.
To think it through, ask yourself why Americans don’t want those jobs. Is it because they’re dirty jobs? That’s the party line. And that may be a small part if it, but cleaning hotels isn’t that bad. Washing and bussing dishes isn’t that bad. Picking tomatoes isn’t that bad.
Before you say, “Hold on; it’s bad enough,” let me agree that none of it is desirable work to be sure. I mean, I don’t want to go do it. However, American citizens line up to do a lot worse jobs … such as cleaning out and repairing sewer lines. So, why will an American worker clean out a sewer line but not pick a pretty tomato?
The answer, again, is pretty straight forward when you think it through: the guy who cleans out your sewer line is a plumber, and he makes a whole lot more money per hour to do that work than he could by doing those other jobs. If he could make the same amount doing dishes, don’t you think he’d rather be inside cleaning dishes than outside in the mud cleaning sewer pipes? Bending over the tomato plants will also work just as well for sporting that plump plumber derrière.
Americans don’t want certain jobs because wages for those particular jobs have been suppressed for decades by the availability of cheap, illegal immigrant labor. If there had been a ready pool of people willing to take those jobs at bottom wages, then the wages would have had no choice but to rise over the decades to a level that would attract workers. The dishes have to be washed for the grand hotels to stay in business, and there is a wage at which Americans will line up for the job.
That’s just market dynamics, but that wages sink to whatever the lowest common denominator will accept is also just market dynamics.
Now we come to the point where immigration economics really kicks in. The dirty secret is that it is not just the politicians who want the cheap labor and not just big business owners. American citizens want a peasant class, too. That’s why the politicians get away with it.
Americans want cheap tomatoes and cheaper dinners out. (Well, many of them; not all.) We all know that, if the pickers and the dish washers made more money, we’d have to pay more for the food we eat in and more for the food we eat out. We’d have less to spend on video games and larger televisions. That’s also just a market dynamic. You’re going to pay more for a lot of things if illegal aliens don’t do the jobs for less.
So, from the bottom to the top, illegal immigration is all about the economic benefits of having a peasant class to do the dirty work in order to afford all the citizens a little better lifestyle.
But if establishing some people as an illegal class that many citizens turn a blind eye to is something many Americans want, why do politicians eventually always come around to talking about making more immigrants legalwhen it is making these workers illegal that maintains the peasant labor pool?
The economics and politics of immigration reform
The rub in all of this is that the peasant class eventually gets large enough to stage a peasant revolt. That’s when the federal government starts to talk once again about amnesty — the politically correct term for which is “immigration reform.”
Naturally, the politicians do all they can to avoid the term “amnesty” because all previous amnesties left a bad taste in Joe and Jolene Citizen’s mouths because the government promised not to let illegals in again and then did so anyway. (And Americans are ambivalent about having a peasant class; they want the cheap tomatoes but they don’t want their own jobs taken, or they feel bad about seeing people work so cheaply, and guilt kicks in.)
In the guilt cycle, we atone for our sins and then go back to repeating them. So, the politicians atone for guilt by granting citizenship to those who have been here awhile and then keep letting lots more illegals in to maintain the peasant worker class. (And Joe and Jolene really don’t think too much about this because they like those cheap tomatoes. If you think about it too much, the guilt kicks in, and it’s hard to enjoy the cheap tomato.)
Bear in mind, these workers have to be illegal to remain a peasant class because that’s what forces them to keep their heads down. Just letting in more legalized labor would not do as much to hold the price down.
Sooner or later, however, you have to give that growing peasant class citizenship. What you forgot about when building up the peasant labor pool is that those people also suffer from this thing we call the “human condition.” So, they start to expect citizenship because they are tired of seeing everyone else around them have more rights and more money than they do. At first, they were glad to come here just for the economic benefit, but by the second generation they start to reach for a higher brass ring. We all rise to a plateau and then feel we could be happy with just thirty percent more.
If you don’t grant a path to citizenship eventually for all your indentured servants, you face a peasant revolt. Their sheer numbers give them power. So, the gates finally open under pressure to allow citizenship for the vast bulk of those who are here illegally. And then they shut again, and all eyes turn blind again in order to develop a new peasant class. We are currently at the peasant revolt point where we have to deal with this.
Of course, President Obama has been intimating openly for seven years now that he will open those gates to citizenship. Naturally that has attracted hoards of people to migrate to the U.S. illegally in hopes that they will make it through the gates of the city before they close again. This has made the problem grow fast enough that the time for resolving a peasant revolt is happening during Obama’s own shift as president.
Obama knew that it would happen that way. It’s advantageous because, if he can be the one who gets the hoards in the door, they will probably all become good Democrats to bestow their blessed new votes upon him and his. Most good citizen Democrats will support open-door policies toward mass immigration because it is the soft-hearted thing to do. So, Obama won’t find much resistance from his own party.
At the same time, many Republicans in Congress will support it because the revolt is happening. There is no getting around it. Republicans know that even legal immigrants are willing to work for less than native citizens because of the situations they came out of; so it’s good for big business. Still helps keep down the cost of labor, even if not as much as illegal immigration does.
That is why you continually see there is no will on either side of the aisle to do anything real to stop illegal immigration for good. That’s why the Republicans capitulated overnight in granting money for immigration reform without a word … once the last elections were over. The last thing they would want to do is talk about this elephant in the room and expose the real underpinnings of illegal immigration.
At the same time, they created funding for more border security for political cover. That along with all the talk about how difficult it is to arrest and deport millions is all smoke and mirrors to appease the concerns of rank and file Republicans who are tired of being unemployed. You know now that it was smoke and mirrors because you can see that, after a couple of years, talk of immigration reform has done nothing to stem the problem.
The real solution — if everybody wanted one — is obvious, easy and inexpensive; and I already completely covered it in just one sentence. Jail the employers, and the problem goes away on its own. It’s not about bolting the gates at the border. Illegal immigrants are not coming here because they love the culture; they are coming here for economic opportunity because the peasant class here is a lot better off than the peasant class at home. You can’t blame them. I don’t. Bad as the wages and benefits may be, they’re much better than what they had. If I were in their shoes, I might do the same thing to feed my family.
So, that’s how the game is played and why Republican politicians are ready to allow amnesty without calling it that while making a lot of noise about spending money to bar the gates. That’s why they’ll continue to turn a blind eye toward the employers who hire illegal aliens.
It would be a simple thing to create a law that awards jail time based on the number of illegal aliens hired and to start auditing companies now. It’s not that hard for auditors to see if all employees have the right proof of citizenship, and it’s not hard, as the person doing the hiring, to make sure that all employees have the right documentation and to prove it with facsimiles. You do need good quality documentation that’s hard to counterfeit, but that’s doable, and no system has to be perfect in order to be much better than what we have.
You won’t hear that talked about by any politician — not even Donald Trump, who is still stuck on the wall.
What is the cost of immigration economics?
The New York Times just published an article about some of the costs of immigration that I find to be far worse than paying more for my tomatoes. Frankly, I’ve been coming across these kinds of articles a lot lately. This one talks about the Islamization of England through attempted control of its public schools by Islamic immigrants. It is stunning how far the English have gone in turning some schools into Muslim cultural institutions.
I read a lot of major European newspapers, and I’ve been seeing this all over Europe for a couple of years. It’s a high social cost.
Articles in The Telegraph, The Guardian, The Daily Mail, The Jerusalem Post, and numerous other major news sites show me a pattern happening in countries that have been too liberal in their immigration policies. Britain, Germany, France, Norway and Sweden, to name a few are all starting to see internal revolt from their native citizens against immigration because certain immigrants truly do not like the culture they are moving into. They seek to turn the country into what they are used to.
I think the resulting homogenization of cultures that happens when immigrants try to turn their new land into their old land is also a great loss of diversity and interest.
Here’s an article on Germany that describes the problem there. Germany has the second-most liberal immigration policy in the world. Guess which nation has the most liberal immigration policy in the world? The U.S.
These social costs of immigration become worse, the faster you bring migrants in and the more you crowd diverse people together. They don’t go away just because you think people shouldn’t react that way to each other. They are a great cost in terms of created conflict.
My own experience of immigration in my neck of the woods
I feel strongly that immigration in the U.S. needs to be slowed way down. Liberals are creating huge culture clashes by not giving people time to get used to each other’s ways, and they’re creating overpopulation and great environmental harm.
I see this happening all around me. The county I live in is experiencing gridlock for the first time in its existence. It has doubled in size in two decades, and most of the population growth has come from immigration. While it is about as far from Latin American as you can get, billboards and signs are now starting to use Spanish with no English translation, but there has also been a huge influx of Russians, Ukrainians, and Indians.
Prior to to the last two decades, population growth and immigration in this county were gradual. Rapid population growth is resulting in tighter and tighter building regulations to avoid the problems of overdevelopment; so how is such immigration good for the people who live here? Why are we better off with more gridlock? (Simple. It sells more real estate, so again it’s all about the money.)
For me it is not about where the people come from, it’s about the sheer number of people. Why do I want them? I wouldn’t want this level of immigration even if they all came from merry old England where my ancestors came from. We have enough people, thanks, and far too few good paying jobs. In fact, the increase in the number of employed immigrants during Obama’s reign almost exactly matches the increase in the number of jobs during Obama’s reign. So, guess where the jobs have gone and why they pay less and why so many American citizens have stepped out of the labor force (because the replacement jobs pay less).
Nevertheless, the group of Latino immigrants is different from all others — much different. Have you noticed television programming is becoming increasingly dominated by Spanish all over the nation. That’s never happened with any other language in this county, and yet this country was made from immigrants from all over the world. All other people accepted the language and culture they moved into and made it their own and became a part of it.
This pressure to latinize our own culture in order to accommodate is not because the people are different from other immigrants. They’re just as nice as any other group of people. What’s different is the volume. Latin American immigrants provided such a major portion of the carefully engineered peasant population that they don’t have to make those changes. They are a large enough group to demand others change to accommodate them. This is the cost of creating a large peasant population.
Lest anyone mistake me in an oversensitive manner to thinking I’m calling them peasants because they are Latin, I want to place a reminder here that race has nothing to do with it. They are peasants because they are part of an illegal population made up of all races that exists intentionally to provide cheap labor for the United States. They exist because politicians intentionally turn a blind eye to them but keep them illegal so they have to hold their heads down.
Big businesses love cheap labor. Big real estate developers love population growth. The locals aren’t having babies fast enough, so immigration means a lot more construction of everything and cheap labor to do the construction so the developers make more money all around.
I have seen vast acres of beautiful, fertile agricultural land and entire forested mountainsides in my county turn into housing developments entirely bought up by immigrants. In my area, its has turned a beautiful rural county into a sprawling suburb. It’s certainly not an environmental positive, but Democrats love it, too.
The cultural cost of mass migration
The current European immigration crisis has become a political inferno because Islamic immigrants try to change the cultures they move into. Just so this discussion is not about Islam, lest people cop an argument that I’m Islamophobic, let’s imagine that it was Jewish mass migration into the United States. In my opinion, if Jews moved to this nation and wanted to speak Hebrew at home and to practise all the rules of Judaism, no one should have a problem with that; but if many Jews moved here and, because they had the power of numbers, insisted that government documents be written in Hebrew, we should all have a major problem with that. If they insisted Torah be fought in public schools we should have a problem with that. If they went further and insisted that Torah law become the law of the land, we should have a very big problem with that.
That, however, has not happened with Jewish immigration, but in some European countries Muslim immigrants are demanding public school classes teach their religion and that government institutes Sharia law. Read the New York Times article above. It will open your eyes about a pattern that is recurring in a number of Western nations.
I certainly would not move to France and expect the French to speak English to me or to write government documents in English for me. Yet, people are moving to France from Islamic nations and demanding that courts start recognizing Sharia or that the country create special courts for Muslims.
Culture clashes like this are unavoidable when immigrants are brought in from one culture in huge numbers. If we do not slow immigration to a level where migrants can assimilate with the culture of the country they are moving into, then we will certainly create more and more internal conflicts that will begin to boil over.
What may seem like a liberal dose of love toward immigrants will prove to be naiveté about human interactions. You have to allow time for people to adjust to each other. When you force people together as Obama has done (doubling the immigration rate) or as Merkel has done in Germany, you continually spawns greater conflict. People do not adjust to each other just because they are forced to.
One of my problems is that I love different cultures so much
I like to see lots of difference in culture. Viva la difference. I don’t like homogeneity. And that’s why people need to assimilate when they move into a country, rather than try to transform it into something more like their own culture and country.
Each country’s culture has its own beauty, and we are losing that all over the world rapidly due to globalization. People in those cultures are feeling that loss. And it’s not inevitable. It’s something politicians are forcing.
Before you throw the race card at me, you need to know this is written by a guy who thinks interracial children are the most beautiful children on earth, who loves the different looks of different races for all the exotic variety of beauty race gives to this world, who loves accents and who loves to travel and who hopes that nations will have distinctive cultures when he travels to them. Since I was a child I was brought up to love all people of all races and to believe that each race is a different kind of flower in God’s flower garden. The world teams with creative diversity, and that’s beautiful.
But I’d like Norway to be Norwegian in culture and England, English and Germany, German and Morocco, Moroccan. I don’t want an homogenized world. I want a world with different nations and cultures that respect each other and get along, and that is not what we are getting with mass migration. We are getting a lot more racial conflict due to people who seem to have an agenda of forcing others together.
I don’t think crashing people together like neutrons in a particle accelerator is going to create any chemistry other than a great big bang. People who want to migrate to another country should not go with any intention of changing that nation’s culture, which particularly includes language. Go to appreciate and mix with the culture that is there and become a part of it. If you don’t like that culture as it is, just don’t go!
I also don’t think that overpopulation is a good thing. Bringing in hundreds of thousands of immigrants into a state like Florida or California that is, in my opinion, already overpopulated makes no sense. Flooding them into rural areas also makes no sense, as it completely destroys the rural nature of those areas.
I don’t see that we need more people or that we have a duty to take them in. But I DO see that it serves the interest of real estate developers and of businesses that want cheap labor and of politicians that think they can bolster the vote for their party if they give thousands of migrant workers citizenship so they can vote.
What you see in all the fury around Donald Trump’s rallies is the anger that comes from forcing people together in mass finally starting to express itself. And you’re going to see a lot more of it! The cost in civil unrest is going to become quite high as a result of people who think they know how to do good by forcing others together.
The most liberal nations of the world are destroying their own cultures and creating racial and nationalistic strife because many of their citizens value their culture and many of the immigrants do not. In Europe you can see that immigrants treat the culture they are moving into with contempt. Violent crime has surged. While some politicians may be advocating rapid immigration out of a sense that they are doing good (acting benevolent toward underprivileged or persecuted people) and others are doing it just to add voters or bring in cheap labor for their Wall Street benefactors, the cost is going to be great.
Just know that what you are seeing on both sides of Trump rallies is just the tip of the flame unless politicians start backing down from forcing immigration in their already overpopulated nations.
From Stankov, June 12 2016
How the Ruling US Cabal Create Havoc out of Desperation
Georgi Stankov, June 12, 2016
Today a PAT member, who is in contact with Trump’s election campaign and informs his advisers on the presidential race about the articles on this website dealing with the energetic and spiritual background of the political events in the USA, wrote to me about the Orlando massacre in a night club this night:
“Well I am receiving some strong messages this morning about the Orlando shooting this morning…. I believe it was planned by the cabal, I could be wrong but I just can’t shake the thought! Also interesting it happened just before Trump’s speech tomorrow (with new revelations on the Clintons’ crimes) … coincidence? Hmmm!!”
My initial response was:
“It seems to be a planned massacre, there is no doubt about that and I was wondering when the next such psyop will be triggered by the US cabal. Let us see how this event will play out with respect to Trump’s speech this week. He was accused of being a catalyst for racism and if they interpret this event in this light then we know for certain that they are targeting him.”
Well, from what I have read so far this latest US massacre in a long tradition of savage acts in this country in turmoil, seems to be a total disaster for the cabal. If it was meant to create havoc on behalf of the elite’s candidate Killary and put the blame on Trump as a catalyst of racism it has already backlashed. While Obama stopped short of admitting that it was a terror act of radical Islamism: “We know enough to say this is an act of terror, act of hate“, Trump was much more vocal in his comments: “Is President Obama going to finally mention the words radical Islamic terrorism? If he doesn’t, he should immediately resign in disgrace!” No doubt this is a direct attack on Killary after Obama officially endorsed her.
And here we have a very interesting stalemate (Pat(t) in German) situation as in chess, where the cabal make the first move only to be confronted with a check mate by the party of light in the next moves. This is the divine logic behind their current demise. After the heating of the emotional atmosphere on this planet reached a peak last week during the massive cleansing of the two lower chakras of pecuniary and existential fears of the masses, now come the emotional reverberations – from dramatic clashes between British and Russian hooligans in the EU soccer championship in France to the usual mass killings in the Empire of Evil that mark a new final level of brutality and human debasement.
But as we have also entered a new level of almost total transparency, the truth emerges immediately and exposes the crimes of the cabal instantaneously. As ZeroHedge has just posted, the Orlando murderer was an employee of the biggest security company of the global cabal that was embroiled in smuggling criminal aliens over the Mexican border into the USA and letting them free to do whatever they want. This has always been one of the tactics of the US cabal to create havoc and criminal unrest in the country as to rectify further measures to clamp down the civil rights of the people and install the NWO.
But this time the Orlando massacre plays fully into the hands of Trump and his anti-establishment campaign and I am very curious what he will say in his announced speech which he is supposed to give tomorrow. There is no doubt that this world has entered a new phase of rapid resolution of human karma, where the domino pieces begin to fall with a rapid pace. This summer is going to be very hot and everything points to the final resolution before it ends.
I have been personally taken away for the last 48 hours from this earth and have spent most of time in a dreamy and sleepy state without any clear memory what has happened. At the same time the source energies are pouring through my left brain chakra like the Niagara falls and my body has almost ceased to function in this reality.
The emotional turmoil last week was exceptional and beyond human. The fact that the Elohim came yesterday to console me in my emotional desperation in the middle of the worst cleansing of human dross tells me that it was a most critical phase in the ascension process. Normally the Elohim never come to me and support me in such an obvious manner as they know that I can quickly recover on my own when the wave has finished. This time the energetic situation must have been so critical that they had to come in person – three of them – and give me this message of consolation: “Everything is in perfect order, you must now fully relax, have faith and delegate your destiny into the hands of the HR that have taken full control over this ascension show on earth.” There is nothing we can do now as humble human beings, but just survive the mighty energies of the Source that stream through our bodies and fields as powerful cascades and try to quickly recover, preferable in nature, during the short respites in between as to be ready for the next bout.
___________________________________
Orlando Killer Worked For Company Transporting Illegal Immigrants Inside US; Was Interviewed By FBI 3 Times
ZeroHedge, June 12, 2016
In a surprising discovery, the Palm Beach Post first reported that according to state records, Orlando shooter Omar Mateen – who as we reported earlier was licensed as a security guard and also holds a firearms license – was employed by the US subsidiary of G4S plc, a British multinational security services company, whose US-headquarters are located in Jupiter, Fla, and which also happens to be the world’s largest security company by revenue.
Shortly thereafter, G4S confirmed that Omar Mateen has worked for the company since 2007. This is the statement released from G4S:
“We are shocked and saddened by the tragic event that occurred at the Orlando nightclub. We can confirm that Omar Mateen had been employed with G4S since September 10, 2007. We are cooperating fully with all law enforcement authorities, including the FBI, as they conduct their investigation. Our thoughts and prayers are with all of the friends, families and people affected by this unspeakable tragedy.”
In other words, Mateen who according to preliminary reports, had been on a terrorist watchlist, and who still managed to obtain weapons thanks to his various licenses and permits just last week, was employed by one of the world’s largest security companies, where he may have had extensive clearances well above his pay grade, not to mention access to sophisticated military weapons and equipment.
But where it gets more disturbing is that as Judicial Watch reported several days ago, in a post titled, “DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing Vanloads Of Illegal Aliens Away From Border“, border patrol sources said that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was quietly transporting illegal immigrants from the Mexican border to Phoenix and releasing them without proper processing or issuing court appearance documents. As a reminder, the government classifies them as Other Than Mexican (OTM) and this week around 35 were transferred 116 miles north from Tucson to a Phoenix bus station where they went their separate way.Judicial Watch was present when one of the white vans carrying a group of OTMs arrived at the Phoenix Greyhound station on Buckeye Road.
And this is where the Mateen-G4S link emerges: as JW reported previously, a security company contracted by the U.S. government is driving the OTMs from the Border Patrol’s Tucson Sector where they were in custody to Phoenix, sources said. The firm is the abovementioned G4S, the world’s leading security solutions group with operations in more than 100 countries and 610,000 employees. G4S has more than 50,000 employees in the U.S. and its domestic headquarters is in Jupiter, Florida.
Judicial Watch noted that it had filed a number of public records requests to get more information involving the arrangement between G4S and the government, specifically the transport of illegal immigrants from the Mexican border to other parts of the country. The photo below shows the uniformed G4S guard that transported the OTMs this week from Tucson to Phoenix.
Outraged Border Patrol agents and supervisors on the front lines say illegal immigrants are being released in droves because there’s no room to keep them in detention. “They’re telling us to put them on a bus and let them go,” said one law enforcement official in Arizona. “Just move those bodies across the country.” Officially, DHS denies this is occurring and in fact earlier this year U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner R. Gil Kerlikowske blasted Border Patrol union officials for denouncing this dangerous catch-and-release policy. Kerlikowske’s scolding came in response to the congressional testimony of Bandon Judd, chief of the National Border Patrol Council, the labor union that represents line agents. Judd told lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee that illegal immigrants without serious criminal convictions can be released immediately and disappear into the shadows. Kerlikowske shot back, telling a separate congressional committee: “I would not stand by if the Border Patrol was — releasing people without going through all of the formalities.
* * *
Meanwhile, the Hill reported that Mateen’s employment, and gun licenses, were untouched even though the FBI confirmed it had interviewed the 29-year-old three times before the shooting took place early Sunday morning. An official said that the FBI first became aware of the suspect, Omar Mateen, 29, in 2013 when he made “inflammatory comments to coworkers alleging possible terrorist ties.”
In the course of that investigation, Mateen was interviewed twice, but the FBI was unable to verify the substance of his comments.
Then, one year later, in 2014 the FBI conducted an investigation into possible ties between Mateen and an American suicide bomber. The FBI conducted another investigation, which included an interview with Mateen, but determined that the contact did not constitute a threat at that time. Which may be an overstatement: the FBI’s 2014 probe allegedly found that the Orlando shooter had “minimal” contact with Florida al-Nusra fighter Moner Abusalha who blew himself up in Syria.
In 2015, after Moner Abusalha became the first American suicide bomber in Syria, the FBI investigated Omar Mateen’s connection to Abu-Salha. Abu-Salha went to the Middle East, trained, and returned to the Treasure Coast, specifically Vero and fort Pierce, to recruit. The FBI says he didn’t recruit anyone, but it’s possible he did have contact with Mateen.
The FBI said it is looking into any and all connections, both domestic and international to the shooting. It appears to have found nothing despite it all being laid out in front of its face.
The agent at Sunday afternoon’s press briefing also confirmed reports that the shooter called 911 before the massacre, and said his remarks had general connections to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) terror group. The content of those calls is now federal evidence.
It gets even more bizarre: despite his chequered history and his numerous FBI encounters, the Orlando Police just reported that he had managed to purchase firearms in just this past week.
A Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives spokesperson confirmed that Mateen legally purchased 2 firearms — a handgun and a long gun, “within the past few days.”
Armed with all this information, the big question, now that it has emerged that Mateen worked for the same company that has been tasked – under questionable circumstances – to transport illegals into the US, is whether or not this individual who swore allegiance to ISIS moments before the worst mass shooting and who was also employed by G4S for almost a decade, and who had been interviewed by the FBI three times and yet still managed to buy guns just last week, was also tasked in any way in facilitating the transport of illegal immigrants across the border, and if so, whether he helped other like-minded radical islamists enter the country.
We are confident all these questions will be addressed by the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and the government, and that the media – liberal or otherwise – will promptly follow up on these key questions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)